At the initial hearing conducted in this matter in April 2002, claimant was asked whether he had returned to work "in any capacity" since the underlying accident, and claimant responded in the negative. Appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed July 29, 2003, which ruled that claimant violated Workers' Compensation Law § 114-a and disqualified him from receiving wage replacement benefits.Ĭlaimant suffered a work-related accident in May 2001 when he was thrown from the vehicle he was operating and injured, among other things, his head, neck and lower back. Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent.Ĭrew III, J.P. In the Matter of the Claim of Michael McCormack, Appellant, v Eastport Manor Construction et al., Respondents. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.Īs corrected through Wednesday, August 24, 2005 (2005 NY Slip Op 05139) Matter of McCormack v Eastport Manor Constr. Matter of McCormack v Eastport Manor Constr.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |